Skip to content
Automate

AI agents with review gates

Tool-using agents for bounded tasks, with queues, monitoring, and approval where risk requires it.

Engagement
Estimated after discovery
Timeline
Phased after discovery
Rautenberg Pitch Engine: A Claude Code Research Studio for a Documentary Producer
Recent project: Rautenberg Pitch EngineRead the case study

The Approach

The work starts by separating what AI should draft, classify, extract, or suggest from what a person should approve. The review loop, data flow, prompts, model calls, fallbacks, and operational interface are then designed around that boundary.

The Outcome

Your team gets a faster workflow without handing important judgement to a black box. AI handles repetitive steps, people stay responsible for decisions.

01

Document extraction and structured data capture from messy inputs

Repetitive processing gets handled by the workflow, with people reviewing instead of typing

02

Support, lead, or request triage with confidence-aware routing

Response and handoff times shrink because routing happens automatically

03

Approval queues where AI drafts and humans review before action

Triage, extraction, and reporting come out consistent across every case

Build focus

  1. 01

    Document extraction and structured data capture from messy inputs.

  2. 02

    Support, lead, or request triage with confidence-aware routing.

  3. 03

    Approval queues where AI drafts and humans review before action.

  4. 04

    Reporting drafts, summaries, and internal handoff notes.

  5. 05

    RAG systems and custom assistants grounded in your own knowledge base.

  6. 06

    Monitoring, logging, and fallback paths for production use.

Included

Input capture from forms, inboxes, documents, or databases.

Prompt, model, and tool orchestration for the specific task.

Human review interface with approve, edit, reject, and escalate actions.

Structured outputs saved back into the system of record.

Evaluation checks, confidence signals, and error handling.

Analytics for throughput, accuracy, and manual override patterns.

Frequently Asked Questions

Only when the risk profile supports it. Most business workflows work better with human-in-the-loop automation, where AI drafts, extracts, classifies, or recommends and a person approves important actions.

Yes. Retrieval-based workflows and assistants that use your approved knowledge sources can be built. Access control, data handling, and update processes are scoped up front.

The project starts from the workflow and business outcome. If AI does not improve speed, quality, consistency, or cost in a measurable way, it should not be the centre of the build.

Plan the build

Start your project

Describe the workflow, users, tools, and constraints. webvise turns that into a clear build plan with timeline and budget before implementation starts.

Start a Project
Related offerings